If you’ve been stuck in the cycle of escalation and shutdown, you’ve probably tried everything you can think of:
Explaining more clearly.
Talking at a “good” moment.
Giving space.
Asking for space.
Being patient.
Being firm.
Reading communication advice that made you feel like you were failing.
But there’s a truth most relationship advice skips:
You can’t fix a conflict pattern from the top layer — not when your nervous systems are telling an older story underneath (Porges, 2011).
So before we talk about tools, communication changes, or scripts, we start here — in the deeper layers that quietly run the show.
Let’s take this slowly.
The Moment Things Begin to Change
Every couple has a “turning moment” in their arguments.
For some, it’s when the louder partner’s voice lifts just a little too high — not even yelling, just tightening, quickening.
For others, it’s when the quiet partner’s eyes dim, their shoulders sink, their tone flattens.
These are not personality flaws.
These are bodily cues — signs that you’re sliding out of connection and into survival mode, which is exactly what the polyvagal system does when it detects threat (Porges, 2011).
Your bodies react first.
Your thoughts catch up later.
This is why you can love each other deeply and still feel like strangers in conflict:
you’re no longer speaking from your adult selves.
You’re speaking from your oldest protective wiring.
The Two Protective Strategies You Keep Meeting
Most couples who fall into this pattern aren’t dealing with “communication issues.”
They’re dealing with two different survival responses.
One partner escalates (fight/protest).
They get louder, sharper, more urgent — not because they enjoy conflict, but because losing emotional contact feels threatening.
They’re not trying to attack.
They’re trying to reconnect.
The other partner withdraws (flight/freeze).
They go quiet, overwhelmed, shut down — not because they don’t care, but because the intensity feels unmanageable.
They’re not trying to avoid.
They’re trying to stabilize.
These two strategies — escalation and withdrawal — are both rooted in attachment patterns shaped early in life (Bowlby, 1969; Johnson, 2004).
They simply take different forms.
Ironically, each strategy triggers the other:
- The escalator sees the withdrawer go quiet and panics: “You’re leaving me emotionally.”
- The withdrawer sees the escalator intensify and panics: “You’re not safe right now.”
Both feel threatened.
Both protect themselves.
Both feel misunderstood.
Understanding this is the beginning of everything.
Where These Strategies Come From
If you trace these responses back far enough, you often land in childhood attachment environments (Bowlby, 1969).
The escalator often learned:
- “I must work hard to be heard.”
- “If someone turns away, I’ll lose them.”
- “Connection is safety.”
Intensity was once a way to stay emotionally alive.
The withdrawer often learned:
- “Big emotions aren’t safe.”
- “Staying small keeps the peace.”
- “Distance is safety.”
Silence was once a shield.
These childhood adaptations become adult reflexes — and they surface most strongly in the relationships that matter most (Johnson, 2004).
Not because you’re reenacting the past intentionally,
but because your body believes it has to protect you.
What This Means for Your Relationship
This dynamic isn’t happening because you’re incompatible.
It’s happening because both of you are hitting your deepest wiring at the exact same time.
- When one partner raises their voice, the other’s nervous system hears danger.
- When one partner goes quiet, the other’s nervous system hears abandonment.
- Both think they’re responding to the other.
- Both are actually responding to memory.
If you’ve ever thought:
“Why are you reacting like this? I’m right here.”
or
“Why is this conversation suddenly so big?”
This is why.
What’s happening is emotional time travel.
And the way out is not to communicate harder but to understand what these reactions are protecting.
This is where we turn next.
Your Nervous System Has a Logic of Its Own
When conflict starts, most people believe they’re reacting to the words being spoken.
But your nervous system is actually reacting to cues of safety or danger long before you consciously register them (Porges, 2011). This is why a sigh, a shift in tone, or your partner turning away for two seconds can feel enormous — your body interprets it, not your mind.
You don’t choose these reactions.
They happen through you.
Understanding this isn’t about excusing hurtful behavior.
It’s about reclaiming power:
You can’t change what you don’t understand.
Let’s look more closely at the three most common states couples shift between during conflict.
Fight: The Urgency of Staying Connected
If you’re the one who escalates, this might feel familiar:
Your chest tightens.
Your voice speeds up.
Your thoughts sharpen, but they’re also jumbled.
You’re suddenly working hard to get through.
This isn’t aggression.
It’s urgency — the body’s attempt to pull a partner back into connection.
In attachment terms, this is a classic protest response (Bowlby, 1969).
The nervous system interprets emotional distance as danger, so it moves toward the partner in an intensified way.
Inside, the escalator is rarely thinking:
“You’re failing me.”
It’s usually something closer to:
“I’m losing you. Please come back.”
But the louder the protest, the more the other partner’s system feels threatened.
Flight/Freeze: The Overwhelm of Too Much
If you’re the one who shuts down, your internal experience may look very different:
You feel pressure in your chest.
You can’t find the right words.
You go blank.
Your mind feels foggy.
You want to help — but you feel like you can’t keep up.
You’re not choosing silence; your system is overwhelmed.
The body responds by pulling away or shutting down to minimize threat (Porges, 2011).
Freeze states often disguise themselves as calm or indifference, but inside there’s a storm of overload.
The withdrawer is not thinking:
“I don’t care.”
It’s more like:
“I don’t know what to do. I feel like I’m failing.”
And the harder they try to stabilize, the more the escalator feels abandoned.
Two nervous systems — both overwhelmed, both trying to protect the bond — accidentally end up protecting themselves from each other.
Why Your Reactions Don’t Match the Moment
One of the hardest parts of this dynamic is how disproportionate the reactions can feel.
A small request spirals.
A simple misunderstanding explodes.
A tone shift becomes the trigger for a full argument.
This isn’t because either of you is “too sensitive” or “emotionally immature.”
It’s because conflict pulls both partners closer to their attachment wounds — the places where their younger selves weren’t met, soothed, or understood (Bowlby, 1969; Johnson, 2004).
Your body remembers these moments vividly:
- The feeling of not being heard
- The pressure to stay small or quiet
- The fear of disappointing someone
- The panic of being left alone with overwhelming feelings
So when your partner sighs, hesitates, shuts down, speeds up, or seems distracted, it can ignite these old memories in an instant.
The conflict is present-day.
The fear is historical.
This is why the logical layer of the argument often feels frustrating or irrelevant.
The real conversation is happening underneath.
The Earliest Signs You’re About to Slip Out of Connection
Every couple has predictable early cues.
These are the small moments when repair is easiest — before the protective reflex takes over — but most couples don’t notice them.
Here are a few examples:
For the escalator:
- Your voice changes speed or sharpness
- You interrupt without meaning to
- You start explaining harder
- You feel your chest or throat tightening
- You suddenly feel alone even though your partner is right there
For the withdrawer:
- You stop making eye contact
- Your mind gets foggy
- You lose track of what you were saying
- You feel slow, heavy, or blank
- You want the conversation to end immediately
These sensations are not personality traits.
They are nervous system indicators — early signs that you’re slipping out of connection and into survival.
Most couples only notice the big moments (yelling, shutting down).
But the shift actually begins much earlier, in these tiny somatic cues.
Learning to recognize these early signals is the first meaningful step toward changing the pattern.
The Predictable Arc of an Argument (and Why You Can’t Stop It in the Moment)
Every couple has a version of the same loop:
- A cue appears — a sigh, a delay, a tone, a look.
- One partner’s nervous system fires first — usually the pursuer.
- The other’s fires second — usually the withdrawer.
- Both partners feel misunderstood, even though both are trying, in their own way, to keep the relationship intact.
- The conversation turns into survival, not connection.
None of this means you’re incompatible.
It means your bodies are interpreting the moment differently.
One partner’s system shouts, “Move toward!”
The other’s whispers, “Protect. Step back.”
Each misreads the other’s protection as rejection.
In the language of Attachment Theory, humans are wired to seek proximity when distressed (Bowlby, 1969).
In the language of Polyvagal Theory, our autonomic state shapes our capacity for connection long before our conscious intentions do (Porges, 2011).
Put simply:
Your physiology often speaks louder than your love.
And without tools, it will keep steering the argument for you.
Why You Can’t “Just Communicate Better”
If communication skills alone solved this pattern, the relationship shelves in bookshops would be empty.
In reality, when your body is in a defensive state:
- Your hearing becomes more selective.
- Your tone becomes sharper or flatter.
- Your memory becomes fragmentary.
- Your language becomes more global (“you always…”, “you never…”).
- Your ability to empathize drops.
- Your sense of threat rises.
In this state, your partner’s face can look colder than it actually is.
Their voice can sound more dismissive than they intended.
Your own words come out faster, harsher, or more clipped than you believe.
These are not character failings.
They’re survival modes.
You can’t reason your way out of them — you can only regulate your way out.
And that’s exactly where we’re heading next.
The First Tiny Shift: Seeing the Pattern as a Pattern
Before you try to change anything, the most powerful early step is simply this:
Name the loop, not the flaw.
Instead of
“You always shut down,”
or
“You’re always on my case,”
it becomes:
“This is our loop again. Our bodies are doing the thing.”
This reduces shame.
It reduces blame.
It reintroduces teamwork.
It also changes the question from
“What’s wrong with you?”
to
“What’s happening between us?”
That shift alone can soften the next argument by 30%.
And it sets the stage for everything that follows.
Looking Ahead to Part 2
In Part 2, we move from understanding the pattern to gently changing it in real time.
You’ll learn how to recognize emotional bids beneath conflict, use AEDP-inspired micro-practices to interrupt reactive loops, and build tiny rituals that create safety and predictability. We’ll explore repair scripts, body-based grounding, and daily habits that help partners reconnect even in the chaos of parenting and stress.
This is where insight becomes lived practice — the next layer of transformation.
When We Pull Apart: Practical Tools to Bridge Connection in the Heat of Conflict (Part 2 of 2)
References
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
Johnson, S. (2004). Hold Me Tight: Seven Conversations for a Lifetime of Love. Little, Brown.
Porges, S. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation. W.W. Norton.
Leave a Reply